The CZ P-10 C Gen 2 is a striker-fired 9mm pistol with a 5-inch cold hammer forged barrel and a 19-round capacity. It has an optics-ready slide for mounting red dots and ships with night sights. The frame is fiber-reinforced polymer. Weight is 1.5 lbs. and finish is black. 
 

Key Specifications 

• Model: P-10 C 
• Caliber: 9MM Luger (9X19 Para) 
• Action: Semi-Automatic 
• Capacity: 19 Rounds 
• Barrel Length: 5 inches 
• Weight: 1.5 lbs. 
• Finish: Black 
   

Detailed Features 

The cold hammer forged barrel is a meaningful spec. The process produces consistent bore dimensions, which directly affects accuracy and barrel life over time. 
 
The striker trigger has a short reset and consistent pull weight, which is one of the things that distinguishes the P-10 from competitors at a similar price. The Gen 2 updates refined this further over the original P-10 C. 
 
The optics-ready cut accepts common red dot footprints without an adapter plate. Night sights are included as standard.

The CZ P-10 C Gen 2 gets strong reviews across most ownership categories.

Ergonomics and grip texture come up consistently and positively. The grip is well-shaped for most hand sizes and the texturing provides real retention without being uncomfortable for extended carry or range sessions.

The trigger gets particular attention. CZ improved the reset on the Gen 2, and it's frequently compared favorably to Glock, Sig, and other striker-fired pistols at the same price point. Shooters accustomed to other striker guns often note a meaningful difference.

The optics-ready slide and included night sights make it a practical choice for anyone who wants to run a red dot without immediately buying accessories. Reliability reports are overwhelmingly positive. Few malfunctions across extended round counts is the norm.

The main comparison that comes up repeatedly is against Glock. Most shooters who prefer the P-10 C do so on trigger feel, ergonomics, or value. Some prefer Glock's aftermarket depth or just prefer what they know. Neither side of that debate is wrong.

Value for money is consistently mentioned as a positive. It competes directly with more expensive options and tends to outperform expectations for the price.