Users of the G17 Gen 4 MOS tend to discuss the MOS feature prominently. The ability to mount a red dot without paying for a custom slide milling job is consistently cited as the main reason people choose this variant over the standard G17. Finding the right optic takes some research. The adapter plate system supports several footprints, but compatibility varies, and a few owners mention the process takes more effort than expected.
Ergonomics and reliability comments are essentially the same as for the standard G17 Gen 4: the grip texture and interchangeable backstraps work well for most hand sizes, and the pistol cycles reliably through a wide range of 9mm loads. The trigger gets the usual commentary, consistent pull but heavier than many competitors, and commonly improved with a connector swap.
The aftermarket ecosystem for Glock pistols is a recurring positive. Holsters, sights, magazines, and spare parts are widely available. For the MOS specifically, dedicated MOS-compatible holsters have become common enough that carry isn't a problem.
The main criticism is that the red dot mounting system, while functional, adds height over the bore when an optic is installed. Some shooters prefer suppressor-height iron sights as co-witnesses. Price-wise, most owners feel the MOS premium over the standard G17 is reasonable given the factory optics support.
AI-generated insights derived from customer reviews and discussions on popular gun-enthusiast forums.